View Full Version : updated jan 2, 2011
Jello Biafra
1/3/2011, 10:21 AM
just in case anyone forgot about our orange peeps down south of the red river....
i know i will never give up this fight....
http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~trj/comparing_ou_ut.html
sooneron
1/3/2011, 10:49 AM
He did get one wrong- * has 2 conference titles since 2000.
Jello Biafra
1/3/2011, 11:19 AM
He did get one wrong- * has 2 conference titles since 2000.
its still a page worth printing out and throwing at a head to head recruit...
Widescreen
1/3/2011, 11:25 AM
Good info.
For some reason I was thinking we had more than a 1 game winning streak, though. ;)
Unfortunately, I think
UT has more active players in the NFL (46 to 31)
carries more weight than a lot of the other stuff.
I think I'm going to save this link for awhile....this is great!
Jello Biafra
1/3/2011, 11:58 AM
Good info.
For some reason I was thinking we had more than a 1 game winning streak, though. ;)
Unfortunately, I think
carries more weight than a lot of the other stuff.
how many of ours were first rounders compared to thiers? ;)
ocsooner
1/3/2011, 05:12 PM
Nice work. I love objective instead of subjective analysis.
MyT Oklahoma
1/3/2011, 07:41 PM
This is so cool.
As far as trending programs, that's a lot of yammering to get to what most of us know (I'm a tx fan), that ou has a better football program right now. That said, objective? As far as head to head (the name should be somewhat definitive), to say that it's a tossup because post 1970 ou has won two more games than tx... crimson colored glasses. The margin of victory stats are interesting, but really don't prove much more than a win or loss, you still only get to count it once, and for that one year. It's also hard to believe that vy wasn't a "top 10 player" whatever that means, or that Bradford wasn't either, for that matter. This reads like a guy that needs to do some more homework if he wants to be truly objective. The "tradition" section in particular is just a waste of space.
SoonerMom2
1/3/2011, 11:57 PM
At the Fiesta Bowl we would hear Boomer answered by Sooner and then Texas immediately following answered by SUCKS! It was AWESOME!
bullnoob
1/4/2011, 03:04 AM
Wow, what a great read! If only there was some way to make it required reading for all male athletes in Oklahoma and Texas. Think Shaggy would like to link to it? :)
Sooner_Tuf
1/4/2011, 03:26 AM
LeroyT - You really don't think margin of victory doesn't matter in Dallas each year? What games do remember most?
Leroy Lizard
1/4/2011, 03:49 AM
As far as trending programs, that's a lot of yammering to get to what most of us know (I'm a tx fan), that ou has a better football program right now. That said, objective? As far as head to head (the name should be somewhat definitive), to say that it's a tossup because post 1970 ou has won two more games than tx... crimson colored glasses.
I think that there are only three time spans that are worth mentioning:
1. All-time (UT wins this one)
2. Post-war (the age of modern football, probably a tossup)
3. Post-1982 (the typical recruit's lifetime. Probably a slight edge to OU.)
Just state the facts; let the recruits draw their own conclusion.
cleller
1/4/2011, 09:08 AM
Where did this study originate? What's the Stanford connection (in web address)?
Maybe I just missed something.
SoonerFaninAZ
1/4/2011, 10:52 AM
His point 5.13 is incorrect. In UT's favor.
DeLassus actually has OU ranked #4 and Texas ranked #7. He sorted on schedule points rather than total points.
Not that it matters. But, you know.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.1 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.